By admin 
Opinion by: Grigore Roșu, founder and chief govt officer of Pi Squared
For some, the audacity of questioning the primacy of blockchain in Web3 is borderline heretical. The concept that decentralization and progress might exist with out blockchains appears absurd to those that constructed careers round Bitcoin, Ethereum, and their descendants. Given blockchain’s well-documented scaling limits, nonetheless, there may be an argument to be made that Web3 does not really want blockchains to thrive. As a substitute, it requires fee techniques and verifiable settlement techniques which might be tremendous quick. Blockchains are only one solution to obtain that, not the one means.
Whereas blockchain solved the double-spending drawback, it launched its personal architectural burden: the inflexible fixation on whole ordering, dictating that each transaction should wait its flip in a worldwide queue, processed via a monolithic consensus mechanism. Initially, this made sense within the context of funds, the place safety and ease have been paramount. Nonetheless, within the context of Web3, the place complicated purposes require velocity, flexibility, and scale, this similar mechanism has change into a constraint. It imposes a form of serialized tyranny, throttling throughput and locking builders right into a slim lane of design choices.
The plain affect of FastPay
Cellular remittance app FastPay proved that double-spending could be averted in a different way and not using a whole order. This impressed techniques like Linera, which use unbiased native orderings whereas sustaining world verifiability, proving {that a} completely different, extra scalable future is feasible and already underway. FastPay additionally impressed the likes of POD and Sui’s single-owner objects protocol. If FastPay had been invented earlier than Bitcoin, blockchain may by no means have captured the cultural or technical creativeness in the best way that it did.
Current: Beijing to invest in blockchain, integrate into infrastructure
Some will little question argue that whole ordering is important for monetary integrity or that with out blockchains, decentralization itself unravels. These issues, nonetheless, mistake a selected implementation of trustlessness for trustlessness itself. What really underpins decentralized techniques is the verifiability of a transaction, not the exact order wherein it occurred relative to each different world transaction.
Blockchain’s rising pains are nonetheless on show
Whereas Ethereum’s Dencun improve sought to enhance transaction throughput via “blobs,” the core structure stays tied to whole ordering. Even with Solana’s introduction of the Lattice system, the community continues to endure outages brought on by bugs and extreme load. Moreover, the explosion of L2s is extra a workaround than an answer, offloading transactions from mainnets solely to reintroduce them later in delayed batches, leading to an limitless cycle of what’s primarily congestion administration.
The rise of versatile fee and settlement protocols
Like in legacy tech circles, the “evolve or die” mantra definitely applies to traders and builders anchored to conventional blockchain architectures. Transferring ahead, protocols prioritizing versatile, verifiable fee techniques and settlement over inflexible whole ordering will unlock far higher throughput and higher consumer experiences. As decentralized purposes evolve and autonomous brokers pushed by AI start interacting with blockchains, the price of sequencing all the pieces so as will change into a aggressive legal responsibility.
There have already been indicators of this tectonic shift happening, with the rising adoption of modular blockchain frameworks like Celestia underscoring a broader recognition that classical blockchains are too rigid. Knowledge availability layers, execution shards and offchain verification mechanisms are all makes an attempt to decouple blockchain’s trusted validation from its limiting sequencing mannequin. Whereas these efforts could not break totally from the previous, they level unmistakably towards a way forward for extra adaptable infrastructure.
A brand new position for blockchain
This does not imply blockchain will disappear, nevertheless it should evolve. Trying forward, its most enduring position could also be as a common verifier, much less a grasp ledger and extra of a decentralized notary inside a broader, extra agile stack. Whereas this can be a mandatory evolution, sadly, it is onerous to see how that shift will probably be easy, as an excessive amount of capital, ideology and profession danger is tied up within the legacy narrative.
Many enterprise funds, DeFi protocols, and “Ethereum killers” are financially and reputationally invested in retaining the blockchain central. However historical past has little mercy for technological incumbents that cling to yesterday’s mannequin. Simply because the web outgrew its early walled gardens, Web3 is poised to maneuver past the rigidity of block-based sequencing. The fruits from the subsequent wave of infrastructure will belong to those that perceive and capitalize on this inflection level.
Opinion by: Grigore Roșu, founder and chief govt officer of Pi Squared.
This text is for normal info functions and isn’t meant to be and shouldn’t be taken as authorized or funding recommendation. The views, ideas, and opinions expressed listed here are the writer’s alone and don’t essentially replicate or symbolize the views and opinions of Cointelegraph.